Would you agree...........

....that change made with an approach resembling evolution is a feeble attempt at change? The underlying thought is that evolving change, implied as spread out over time, will rarely achieve the desired outcome.

Where as a revolutionary approach stands a better chance of achieving the desired outcome. The thought here is that the change is so "radical" as to be enthusiastically embraced and implemented by the masses that opposition is simply bowled over.

Does it need to be one or the other?

stay on the offensive and make a difference..................